Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Mail services (such as Google Mail) will often have
directories with names that contain spaces. Acme
does not support spaces in window names. So, replace
spaces in mail directory names with the Unicode
character for visible space.
The code is a bit of an over-approximation and
generally non-optimal.
R=rsc, david.ducolombier, 0intro
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/13010048
|
|
UTF-8 searches with the SEARCH command must
be conducted in two steps: the first sends
the SEARCH command with the length of the
UTF-8 encoded string and the second sends
the literal search term. The searches need
to not be quoted.
R=rsc, david.ducolombier, rsc, 0intro
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/13244043
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/12505045
|
|
R=rsc
CC=r
https://codereview.appspot.com/12577043
|
|
Everyone seems to assume that TERM != dumb implies
ANSI escape codes are okay. In fact, many people assume
that unconditionally, but it is easier to argue back about
TERM=dumb than TERM=9term.
This applies to acme win too, because they share the code.
Set termprog=9term or termprog=win for clients who
need to know.
R=rsc
CC=r
https://codereview.appspot.com/12532043
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/12162043
|
|
See https://bitbucket.org/rsc/plan9port/issue/128/alt-button-sticks-in-acme-sometimes-after
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/11453043
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/10690044
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/10458043
|
|
There are two bugs in pdec() on INT_MIN:
* wrong output.
`n = 1-n' should be `n = -1-n' when n is INT_MIN.
* infinite loop.
gcc optimizes `if(n>=0)' into `if(true)' because `-INT_MIN' (signed integer overflow) is undefined behavior in C, and gcc assumes the negation of a negative number must be positive. The resulting binary keeps printing '-' forever given INT_MIN.
Try the simplified pdec.c below.
$ gcc pdec.c
$ ./a.out -2147483648
--214748364*
$ gcc pdec.c -O2
$ ./a.out -2147483648
<infinite loop>
$ gcc pdec.c -O2 -D__PATCH__
$ ./a.out -2147483648
-2147483648
=== pdec.c ===
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits.h>
#define io void
void pchr(io *f, int c)
{
putchar(c);
}
void pdec(io *f, int n)
{
if(n<0){
#ifndef __PATCH__
n=-n;
if(n>=0){
pchr(f, '-');
pdec(f, n);
return;
}
/* n is two's complement minimum integer */
n = 1-n;
#else
if(n!=INT_MIN){
pchr(f, '-');
pdec(f, -n);
return;
}
/* n is two's complement minimum integer */
n = -(INT_MIN+1);
#endif
pchr(f, '-');
pdec(f, n/10);
pchr(f, n%10+'1');
return;
}
if(n>9)
pdec(f, n/10);
pchr(f, n%10+'0');
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int n = atoi(argv[1]);
pdec(NULL, n);
putchar('\n');
}
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/7241055
|
|
gcc compiles `p + length < p' into 'length < 0' since pointer overflow is undefined behavior in C. This breaks the check against a large `length'.
Use `length > pend - p' instead.
There's no need to check `length < 0' since `length' is from length_decode() and should be non-negative.
===
Try the simplified code.
void bar(void);
void foo(unsigned char *p, int length)
{
if (p + length < p)
bar();
}
$ gcc -S -o - t.c -O2
...
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
testl %esi, %esi
js .L4
rep
ret
.L4:
jmp bar
.cfi_endproc
Clearly `p' is not used at all.
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/7231069
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7565045
|
|
For single-button mouse users.
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7620043
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7304064
|
|
Ubuntu Precise seems to have a buggy X server
that sometimes fails at XCopyArea. Let devdraw
do it itself.
This will slow down remote X a little bit,
but slow and correct is better than fast and broken.
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7310069
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/7228044
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/7225059
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7095050
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7225073
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7070070
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7029054
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/7027044
|
|
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
https://codereview.appspot.com/6850108
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6906057
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/6864051
|
|
R=rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/6854130
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6854094
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6844083
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6847105
|
|
Let's see if that's any better.
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6850103
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6782115
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6850102
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6854093
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6846104
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
http://codereview.appspot.com/6854092
|
|
Probably not the right fix, but gets us going.
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6782113
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6847104
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6855092
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6858071
|
|
Fixed at 100 right now, but the plan is to make it accurate
and then use it.
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6856091
|
|
Also add some ignored files to .hgignore
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6842089
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6736060
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6742064
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
http://codereview.appspot.com/6614056
|
|
R=rsc, 0intro
CC=plan9port.codebot
http://codereview.appspot.com/6739047
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
http://codereview.appspot.com/5495046
|
|
R=rsc
CC=plan9port.codebot
http://codereview.appspot.com/6690049
|
|
R=rsc, quanstro
CC=plan9port.codebot
http://codereview.appspot.com/6657043
|
|
R=rsc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6744056
|